<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letting the air out of the Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air</link>
	<description>From a land of hills and water...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Pope</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Of course the true MacFans will be putting their money right in Steves pocket, lapping up the early adopter price tag. Remember the iPhone price drop recently? It'll come down in price, but like you, it still wont make me buy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the true MacFans will be putting their money right in Steves pocket, lapping up the early adopter price tag. Remember the iPhone price drop recently? It&#8217;ll come down in price, but like you, it still wont make me buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skippy</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-283</guid>
		<description>The lack of optical drive strikes me as a clever mechanism to further strengthen iTunes' dominance in the &#34;legal MP3 sales&#34; market, and to further drive Apple customers to rely on the iTunes music store.

I know a lot of people purchase iTunes songs, burn them to CD, then re-rip them to MP3 format for use on non-iPod devices.  The Apple Air will effectively put an end to that practice for its users.  Certainly not the biggest deal in the world, but I think it's a sufficiently interesting wrinkle to merit a comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of optical drive strikes me as a clever mechanism to further strengthen iTunes&#8217; dominance in the &quot;legal MP3 sales&quot; market, and to further drive Apple customers to rely on the iTunes music store.</p>
<p>I know a lot of people purchase iTunes songs, burn them to CD, then re-rip them to MP3 format for use on non-iPod devices.  The Apple Air will effectively put an end to that practice for its users.  Certainly not the biggest deal in the world, but I think it&#8217;s a sufficiently interesting wrinkle to merit a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janne</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Janne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-284</guid>
		<description>No optical drive is not bad, and not new - the smaller members of the Panasonic Toughbook line have never had one (and I've used one as my primary machine for four years now). One USB port also not bad - use a hub. Slimness, probably not bad, but not important - and again, not new; Sony had/has an insanely thin subnotebook in carbon fiber for the executive who has everything (except a sense of value for money).

But no ethernet? Only wireless? This is supposed to be a travel notebook. Sure, wireless is common, but so are wired ports (especially at hotels). And you may well prefer wired over wireless given the choice anyway; less connection troubles, higher speed.

And as you say, for a subnotebook it's just too big. My R6 has a 10&#34; screen, making the machine the size of a textbook, and quite a bit shorter than A4. That is a decent size; I would not want anything bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No optical drive is not bad, and not new - the smaller members of the Panasonic Toughbook line have never had one (and I&#8217;ve used one as my primary machine for four years now). One USB port also not bad - use a hub. Slimness, probably not bad, but not important - and again, not new; Sony had/has an insanely thin subnotebook in carbon fiber for the executive who has everything (except a sense of value for money).</p>
<p>But no ethernet? Only wireless? This is supposed to be a travel notebook. Sure, wireless is common, but so are wired ports (especially at hotels). And you may well prefer wired over wireless given the choice anyway; less connection troubles, higher speed.</p>
<p>And as you say, for a subnotebook it&#8217;s just too big. My R6 has a 10&quot; screen, making the machine the size of a textbook, and quite a bit shorter than A4. That is a decent size; I would not want anything bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bastianazzo</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>bastianazzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I just can't stand the fact that any Apple solution is so well behaving within a Mac-only environment (Airport, iTunes, Mac to become networked drives, ...): that's even worse than Win!!
Do I like a fantastic looking, good smelling, very cool crystal cage?? Sure I don't! Let me live in my dirty Ubuntu (and any shitty hardware that's not Mac) freedom :)
Very good looking laptop, though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t stand the fact that any Apple solution is so well behaving within a Mac-only environment (Airport, iTunes, Mac to become networked drives, &#8230;): that&#8217;s even worse than Win!!<br />
Do I like a fantastic looking, good smelling, very cool crystal cage?? Sure I don&#8217;t! Let me live in my dirty Ubuntu (and any shitty hardware that&#8217;s not Mac) freedom <img src='http://schwuk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Very good looking laptop, though <img src='http://schwuk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qhartman</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>qhartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-286</guid>
		<description>When asking about target market I think you hit it on the head with the &#34;people with multiple computers&#34; segment. Personally, my preferred method of computing is to have a powerful desktop for &#34;real&#34; work and play, and then a thin &#38; light laptop traveling. Someone who owns a Mac Pro (or even 17&#34; Macbook) and is fully into the Apple world would see the Air as a godsend. Finally they have a sub-4lb machine that they can feel at home with. It's shortcomings don't matter because they can just use their &#34;real&#34; computer for those tasks.

As far as the size is concerned, I think the arguments that it is too big are ill-founded. In my experience, once you get to about the footprint of a piece of letter paper, people stop caring about footprint, they care about thickness. Our culture is so subconsciously built around that dimension, once you hit it, objects tend to effectively disappear because they blend in with everything else you are expected to carry so well. The air gets this balance right. The biggest gripe about thin &#38; lights typically is the keyboard and screen size. The Air gives you plenty of room there because of its' &#34;big&#34; footprint. I think this is a very smart design choice for a thin &#38; light. I mean come on, they're supposed to be &#34;thin &#38; light&#34; not &#34;cramped &#38; squinty&#34; right?

Also, Skippy, very astute. I think you're right on with that point, especially in light of the other announcements that happened at Macworld. I think it was mere convenience that leaving out an optical would be required to hit their size &#38; weight targets.

For myself, it's interesting, but I think I'll pass at that price point.  That said,  I know a lot of people for whom this thing will seem like The Answer. If it comes down to sub-$1500 and runs Ubuntu well, I'll bite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When asking about target market I think you hit it on the head with the &quot;people with multiple computers&quot; segment. Personally, my preferred method of computing is to have a powerful desktop for &quot;real&quot; work and play, and then a thin &amp; light laptop traveling. Someone who owns a Mac Pro (or even 17&quot; Macbook) and is fully into the Apple world would see the Air as a godsend. Finally they have a sub-4lb machine that they can feel at home with. It&#8217;s shortcomings don&#8217;t matter because they can just use their &quot;real&quot; computer for those tasks.</p>
<p>As far as the size is concerned, I think the arguments that it is too big are ill-founded. In my experience, once you get to about the footprint of a piece of letter paper, people stop caring about footprint, they care about thickness. Our culture is so subconsciously built around that dimension, once you hit it, objects tend to effectively disappear because they blend in with everything else you are expected to carry so well. The air gets this balance right. The biggest gripe about thin &amp; lights typically is the keyboard and screen size. The Air gives you plenty of room there because of its&#8217; &quot;big&quot; footprint. I think this is a very smart design choice for a thin &amp; light. I mean come on, they&#8217;re supposed to be &quot;thin &amp; light&quot; not &quot;cramped &amp; squinty&quot; right?</p>
<p>Also, Skippy, very astute. I think you&#8217;re right on with that point, especially in light of the other announcements that happened at Macworld. I think it was mere convenience that leaving out an optical would be required to hit their size &amp; weight targets.</p>
<p>For myself, it&#8217;s interesting, but I think I&#8217;ll pass at that price point.  That said,  I know a lot of people for whom this thing will seem like The Answer. If it comes down to sub-$1500 and runs Ubuntu well, I&#8217;ll bite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joergen Ramskov</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Joergen Ramskov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Don't forget that the battery isn't user replaceable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that the battery isn&#8217;t user replaceable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Christiansen</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Christiansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-288</guid>
		<description>I have a MacBook Pro and though it is a laptop, it is quite heavy and big to carry around. Basically, it stays at my work and I only bring in with me when I'm traveling.

The MacBook Air is smaller, and weight less, it is perfect to put in your backpack and bring with you everywhere without annoyances. I know a friend who had an older mac laptop, 12&#34; and he was so happy with it because of this reason. It is not an Eee or something similar but a real laptop that you easily can bring around.

It is exactly what I need and want, and well, I won't really miss the disc drive. I think I used the disc drive in my mac around 4 times the last year and just to copy a few photos... today it is a lot more attractive to buy a small usb harddrive for this usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a MacBook Pro and though it is a laptop, it is quite heavy and big to carry around. Basically, it stays at my work and I only bring in with me when I&#8217;m traveling.</p>
<p>The MacBook Air is smaller, and weight less, it is perfect to put in your backpack and bring with you everywhere without annoyances. I know a friend who had an older mac laptop, 12&quot; and he was so happy with it because of this reason. It is not an Eee or something similar but a real laptop that you easily can bring around.</p>
<p>It is exactly what I need and want, and well, I won&#8217;t really miss the disc drive. I think I used the disc drive in my mac around 4 times the last year and just to copy a few photos&#8230; today it is a lot more attractive to buy a small usb harddrive for this usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

When Ferrari brings out a new model, do you hear people complaining that it has no towbar, or that you can't use it for work if you're a bus driver? Apple have brought out a computer that's the equivalent of a Ferrari: it's very sleek and expensive and is most likely to be bought by a wealthy middle aged bloke who doesn't get laid very often and wants to impress his peers, . If someone has to have a laptop with an optical drive, or with a FW800 port, or with a 120GB HD, there are plenty alternatives available, but they are less likely to make people go &#34;Ooooooh&#34;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>When Ferrari brings out a new model, do you hear people complaining that it has no towbar, or that you can&#8217;t use it for work if you&#8217;re a bus driver? Apple have brought out a computer that&#8217;s the equivalent of a Ferrari: it&#8217;s very sleek and expensive and is most likely to be bought by a wealthy middle aged bloke who doesn&#8217;t get laid very often and wants to impress his peers, . If someone has to have a laptop with an optical drive, or with a FW800 port, or with a 120GB HD, there are plenty alternatives available, but they are less likely to make people go &quot;Ooooooh&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Yarusso</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Yarusso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-290</guid>
		<description>So, if it doesn't have an optical drive nor an ethernet port, then if you were to get one for free how would you go about putting Ubuntu on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if it doesn&#8217;t have an optical drive nor an ethernet port, then if you were to get one for free how would you go about putting Ubuntu on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan dbb</title>
		<link>http://schwuk.com/articles/2008/01/16/letting-the-air-out-of-the-air#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan dbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.dev/?p=326#comment-291</guid>
		<description>This is a mix of the never-released Palm Foleo and Intel's &#34;Metro&#34; super-thin laptop. Both were poor ideas. Palm just didn't have enough rich Fanbois to make it work.

http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/palm-foleo-hands-on/

&#34;Is it just me or does that computer only have one USB port?&#34;

http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/24/intels-metro-laptop-prototype-is-worlds-thinnest/

&#34;The 0.7-inch thick 2.2-pound Metro [...]&#34;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a mix of the never-released Palm Foleo and Intel&#8217;s &quot;Metro&quot; super-thin laptop. Both were poor ideas. Palm just didn&#8217;t have enough rich Fanbois to make it work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/palm-foleo-hands-on/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/palm-foleo-hands-on/</a></p>
<p>&quot;Is it just me or does that computer only have one USB port?&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/24/intels-metro-laptop-prototype-is-worlds-thinnest/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/24/intels-metro-laptop-prototype-is-worlds-thinnest/</a></p>
<p>&quot;The 0.7-inch thick 2.2-pound Metro [...]&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
